Just a few days ago Formula E had announced that Spark Racing Technologies (SPARK), their technology subsidiary, had been approved for homologation by the FIA to provide cars for Formula E's 2014 season. Now they've announced selection of Berlin as the 10th city in the 2014 season.
This completes the schedule for the 2014 season, which will comprise events in these cities:- London, Rome, Los Angeles, Miami, Beijing, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Putrajaya, Bangkok, and Berlin
The Formula E is an electric car racing series that will launch in 2014, assuming the FIA gives its approval to everything the Formula E organizers have put together. The series is to have 10 teams with two drivers apiece and two cars per driver. The events will be held in city centers, rather than at race tracks.
Senator Cornelia Yzer commented: “Berlin, as an international city and leading metropolis of electric mobility, is an ideal venue for Formula E. We are pleased to be able to host the event in this cosmopolitan city and for Berlin to present new and innovative technologies. Formula E will also inspire people to consider Electromobility.”
Gernot Lobenberg from eMO commented: “Formula E in Berlin will show a wide audience that electric mobility is fun and free of emissions. Formula E also suits the city as to date we have introduced more than 150 projects in the field of electric mobility in Berlin and Brandenburg."
Gerhard W. Steindorf, CEO of Tempelhof, added: "We are very pleased that Formula E will be held at Tempelhof Airport. Since 2009, the historical building has been the scene of numerous, very different events. The airport building is always a spectacular setting for the presentation of innovative ideas and technologies. Formula E is something completely new and pioneering and fits it perfectly into our idea of how this unique place is used.”
Source: Formula E ready to build electric race cars, adds Berlin to 2014 calendar
Friday, July 12, 2013
Who Cares If Electric Racecars Are Not As Fast As Gas Race Cars?
One of my colleagues over on PlugInCars.com (where I write news articles) wrote a piece that tried to diminish the need for electric racing. The thesis is a) the current crop of electric race cars is slower than gas race cars, b) what we need is longer range, not faster performance, and that fast electric cars will have a shorter range.
There's a certain amount of "hmm, good point" to what he says. But then the commentators came along and made it clear that high performance is a desirable trait for electric cars and electric motorcycles. Just scroll down past the article and read the comments. Many of them say they disagree with that writer, if only because there are several kinds of needs that electric vehicles can fill. Not everyone needs to carry a lot of people or stuff, and some people legitimately want speed. Further, racing acts as a test-bed for technology development.
As for the question at the top of this post... we recently had a historic win in the motorcycle category at Pikes Peak. (see also on PlugInCars) This is something the electric motorcycle racing teams have been working towards for years - to win outright, against the best gas bike racers in the world, with an electric motorcycle.
Preceding that win was years of development work. Years in which the electric motorcycle races were slower than the gas bike races. The electric motorcycle races were ignored and shunned in part because they were slower than gas bikes.
To racers what matters most is the speed and capabilities. They don't seem to care about whether it's piston driven, or electrically driven or warp driven, they want speed. An electric bike, or electric car, that's dressed up as a race bike or race car, but is slower than the gas powered equivalent, that's just not interesting.
Hence, as cool as the electric motorcycle racing has been the last few years it was slower than the gas bikes and was ignored by all but the most die-hard electric fanatics (like me).
To answer the question at the top - it may not be important that today's electric race vehicles are slower than todays equivalent gas powered race vehicles. The last several years of electric motorcycle racing had exciting races, after all, even though they were slower than the gas bike racing. What does matter is to keep developing the technology. Soon enough the electric race vehicles will be faster, and with a few breakthroughs in battery technology they'll have enough range.
It's just a matter of technology development. The problems holding electric race vehicles back from full parity with the gas powered race vehicles are all solvable.
There's a certain amount of "hmm, good point" to what he says. But then the commentators came along and made it clear that high performance is a desirable trait for electric cars and electric motorcycles. Just scroll down past the article and read the comments. Many of them say they disagree with that writer, if only because there are several kinds of needs that electric vehicles can fill. Not everyone needs to carry a lot of people or stuff, and some people legitimately want speed. Further, racing acts as a test-bed for technology development.
As for the question at the top of this post... we recently had a historic win in the motorcycle category at Pikes Peak. (see also on PlugInCars) This is something the electric motorcycle racing teams have been working towards for years - to win outright, against the best gas bike racers in the world, with an electric motorcycle.
Preceding that win was years of development work. Years in which the electric motorcycle races were slower than the gas bike races. The electric motorcycle races were ignored and shunned in part because they were slower than gas bikes.
To racers what matters most is the speed and capabilities. They don't seem to care about whether it's piston driven, or electrically driven or warp driven, they want speed. An electric bike, or electric car, that's dressed up as a race bike or race car, but is slower than the gas powered equivalent, that's just not interesting.
Hence, as cool as the electric motorcycle racing has been the last few years it was slower than the gas bikes and was ignored by all but the most die-hard electric fanatics (like me).
To answer the question at the top - it may not be important that today's electric race vehicles are slower than todays equivalent gas powered race vehicles. The last several years of electric motorcycle racing had exciting races, after all, even though they were slower than the gas bike racing. What does matter is to keep developing the technology. Soon enough the electric race vehicles will be faster, and with a few breakthroughs in battery technology they'll have enough range.
It's just a matter of technology development. The problems holding electric race vehicles back from full parity with the gas powered race vehicles are all solvable.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Spark Racing Technology approved by FIA to produce cars for Formula E
Spark Racing Technology today announced they'd created a consortium of companies that together will produce the electric race cars for the Formula E racing series. A decision by the FIA World Council on June 28, 2013 formally approved SPARK's application for homologation as the supplier of all the electrical single-seaters to the first season of Formula E Championship.
SPARK will provide 42 cars Spark-Renault powered solely by electricity to compete in the heart of major cities all over the world.
The consortium includes the companies we already know have been involved with parts of designing and building these cars. These are:-
Patrice RATTI (CEO Renault Sport Technologies): “As a global leader for the production of electric vehicles and with a unique expertise in motorsports ever since the company was founded, the choice of Renault as technical partner to develop the fully electric SRT_01E car for the FIA Formula E championship was obvious.
Renault engineers and motorsport experts are directly contributing to the overall powertrain architecture and are in charge of electric systems' specifications and integration, benefiting from the experience acquired while developing the new 2014 Renault-Energy-F1 Power Unit.
Renault is also working with Spark to enhance the performance and safety level of the SRT_01E car powertrain. The objective is to design an outstanding racecar that will be clean, reliable, safe as well as fast and responsive.”
Sir Frank WILLIAMS (Team Principal - Williams): “Williams Advanced Engineering, the division of the Williams group that commercialises Formula One based technologies, will design and assemble a battery system for all 42 cars that will be used in the FIA Formula E Championship. Williams’ battery energy storage capability first originated from its Formula One programme following the introduction of Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems (KERS) into the sport in 2009. Under the Williams Advanced Engineering brand name, Williams is now active in developing both battery and flywheel energy storage systems for motorsport and non-motorsport applications.”
Tim STRAFFORD (Business Development Manager - McLaren Electronics Systems): “McLaren Electronic Systems is proud to be developing, manufacturing and commissioning the all electric powertrain, including electric motors, motor drives, gearboxes and control systems, that will power the open wheel racing cars contesting this new and innovative championship. This will draw on our expertise accrued over two decades supplying advanced electronic and powertrain systems into professional motorsport and high performance road cars. McLaren Electronic Systems is the Official Supplier of Engine Control Units to Formula One, NASCAR and IndyCar. The company is a two times winner of the Queen’s Award for Enterprise, for Innovation in 2009 and for Export in 2013.”
Andrea PONTREMOLI (CEO - Dallara Automobili): “With our single seater cars running successfully in the most important categories and championships all over the world, we could not lose the opportunity to be part of the new Formula E exciting challenge and we are very thankful to our long term partner Fred Vasseur for the credit he gave us. We will use all our experience and know how to design and build the best possible chassis in terms of performance, reliability, ease of use and safety. The safety aspect is particularly important for us and we are working hard with Spark and the FIA to set new safety standards for such an innovative championship.”
Alejandro AGAG (CEO of Championship promoter Formula E Holdings): “With Formula E being an open championship, the series gives manufacturers the opportunity to showcase their electrical energy innovations and we’re delighted to have Spark Racing Technology as the first, and for them to produce our new fully-electric Formula E car. Spark has enlisted the very best companies in motorsport to aid with its development, with Dallara, Renault, McLaren and Williams all leaders in their respective fields. This clearly shows their commitment to cleaner energy and sustainable mobility, and we’re looking forward to unveiling the first SRT_01E later this year.”
Frédéric VASSEUR (President of Spark Racing Technology): “I am extremely proud and happy to work with the partners SPARK has gathered together to form this unique consortium, a first in the history of motorsport. I regard each and every one of these partners with the highest esteem, I have worked with them throughout my career and they have accompanied me in a lot of the successes I have been fortunate to achieve in my other activities in the traditional motorsport. All consortium members are driven by a motivation to make this innovative project a success. The project is progressing well; we are on schedule and strictly adhering to our specifications. The first car will be officially presented at the Frankfurt Motor Show in September and the first outing will be in the following month.”
SPARK will provide 42 cars Spark-Renault powered solely by electricity to compete in the heart of major cities all over the world.
The consortium includes the companies we already know have been involved with parts of designing and building these cars. These are:-
- Renault: Powertrain architecture, systems integration, powertrain electrical safety & performance optimization
- Williams: Design, manufacture and assembly of batteries and their battery management systems.
- McLaren Electronic Systems: Development, manufacture and supply of electric motor, gearbox and power & control electronics.
- Dallara: Design and construction of the monocoque
- SPARK: Car design and conception (chassis, aerodynamics, assembly, suspension)
Patrice RATTI (CEO Renault Sport Technologies): “As a global leader for the production of electric vehicles and with a unique expertise in motorsports ever since the company was founded, the choice of Renault as technical partner to develop the fully electric SRT_01E car for the FIA Formula E championship was obvious.
Renault engineers and motorsport experts are directly contributing to the overall powertrain architecture and are in charge of electric systems' specifications and integration, benefiting from the experience acquired while developing the new 2014 Renault-Energy-F1 Power Unit.
Renault is also working with Spark to enhance the performance and safety level of the SRT_01E car powertrain. The objective is to design an outstanding racecar that will be clean, reliable, safe as well as fast and responsive.”
Sir Frank WILLIAMS (Team Principal - Williams): “Williams Advanced Engineering, the division of the Williams group that commercialises Formula One based technologies, will design and assemble a battery system for all 42 cars that will be used in the FIA Formula E Championship. Williams’ battery energy storage capability first originated from its Formula One programme following the introduction of Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems (KERS) into the sport in 2009. Under the Williams Advanced Engineering brand name, Williams is now active in developing both battery and flywheel energy storage systems for motorsport and non-motorsport applications.”
Tim STRAFFORD (Business Development Manager - McLaren Electronics Systems): “McLaren Electronic Systems is proud to be developing, manufacturing and commissioning the all electric powertrain, including electric motors, motor drives, gearboxes and control systems, that will power the open wheel racing cars contesting this new and innovative championship. This will draw on our expertise accrued over two decades supplying advanced electronic and powertrain systems into professional motorsport and high performance road cars. McLaren Electronic Systems is the Official Supplier of Engine Control Units to Formula One, NASCAR and IndyCar. The company is a two times winner of the Queen’s Award for Enterprise, for Innovation in 2009 and for Export in 2013.”
Andrea PONTREMOLI (CEO - Dallara Automobili): “With our single seater cars running successfully in the most important categories and championships all over the world, we could not lose the opportunity to be part of the new Formula E exciting challenge and we are very thankful to our long term partner Fred Vasseur for the credit he gave us. We will use all our experience and know how to design and build the best possible chassis in terms of performance, reliability, ease of use and safety. The safety aspect is particularly important for us and we are working hard with Spark and the FIA to set new safety standards for such an innovative championship.”
Alejandro AGAG (CEO of Championship promoter Formula E Holdings): “With Formula E being an open championship, the series gives manufacturers the opportunity to showcase their electrical energy innovations and we’re delighted to have Spark Racing Technology as the first, and for them to produce our new fully-electric Formula E car. Spark has enlisted the very best companies in motorsport to aid with its development, with Dallara, Renault, McLaren and Williams all leaders in their respective fields. This clearly shows their commitment to cleaner energy and sustainable mobility, and we’re looking forward to unveiling the first SRT_01E later this year.”
Frédéric VASSEUR (President of Spark Racing Technology): “I am extremely proud and happy to work with the partners SPARK has gathered together to form this unique consortium, a first in the history of motorsport. I regard each and every one of these partners with the highest esteem, I have worked with them throughout my career and they have accompanied me in a lot of the successes I have been fortunate to achieve in my other activities in the traditional motorsport. All consortium members are driven by a motivation to make this innovative project a success. The project is progressing well; we are on schedule and strictly adhering to our specifications. The first car will be officially presented at the Frankfurt Motor Show in September and the first outing will be in the following month.”
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Chip Yates tries out Empulse R at Thunderhill for a feature in Motortrend Magazine
Browsing on Facebook I found this item posted by Brammo showing some pictures with them meeting Chip Yates at Thunderhill Raceway. Thunderhill is of course Brammo's usual test track.
Chip Yates is an AMA licensed racer, and in 2010-11 he had built an electric motorcycle meant for racing. He'd originally meant to race it in the TTXGP, but the final build was too heavy for the TTXGP rules, so he went on his own to race in other venues.
More recently he was going to race with Lightning Motorcycles at the Pikes Peak race last weekend, but that arrangement broke up. One wonders.. does this mean he's gonna do something more with Brammo than this?
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458330970443&set=a.10151458330725443.1073741844.108820970442&type=1&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458351595443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458488470443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458611850443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458558305443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
Chip Yates is an AMA licensed racer, and in 2010-11 he had built an electric motorcycle meant for racing. He'd originally meant to race it in the TTXGP, but the final build was too heavy for the TTXGP rules, so he went on his own to race in other venues.
More recently he was going to race with Lightning Motorcycles at the Pikes Peak race last weekend, but that arrangement broke up. One wonders.. does this mean he's gonna do something more with Brammo than this?
![]() |
| "Chip on Camera" |
![]() |
| Setting up GoPro |
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458351595443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458488470443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
![]() |
| Trying out the Empulse TTX |
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151458558305443&set=a.442402705442.239501.108820970442&type=1&theater
Why does racing have to be noisy? Is the noise obnoxious or enjoyable?
Here's an observation that often comes up at the electric races I attend: Isn't it nice to be able to have a conversation while a race is going on?
For many, racing is not just the speed, it's the noise, the smell of burnt fuel, or burnt rubber, the unhealthy food, etc. To each their own really, but the noise is one of the obvious differences between gasoline-powered and electricity-powered racing. In some cases gasoline-powered racing really plays up the noise and other aspects of using flammable explosive liquids to power their machines. I recall seeing one video of a race car with banks of tailpipes along each side of the car, and those pipes were literally belching fire as the driver cranked the accelerator pedal.
We have decades now of cultural experience saying that race vehicles are loud, they belch fumes, and often belch fire. Oh, and if they crash, race vehicles often catch fire.
But does it have to be that way?
In some circles the noise is called noise pollution, and the fumes are called air pollution. Other people outside the racing community want both to be reduced. For example, the common complaint about off-road vehicle enthusiasts is the noise diminishing the feeling of tranquility many seek in the wilderness.
I've been to enough electric racing events to see several sides of this. First, is the relative quietness of electric race vehicles lets you have normal conversation during the race, and to hear the announcers. The first time I experienced this was at the 24 Hours of Electricross race put on by Zero Motorcycles (a 24 hour Endurance race using electric dirt bikes with fast swappable batteries), and someone came up to me while I was filming and whispered "isn't it nice to be able to have a conversation next to a race track?" I believe that made it into the following video (see writeup of that event here and here and here):
In the video you can also hear sounds that would have been drowned out had these been gas bikes, such as noises from the paint-ball field next door.
How many race tracks have neighbors who complain about the noise, and have instituted noise restrictions on the track? Well, you might think someone who moves in next door to a race track might expect some noise, but this does happen. Laguna Seca Raceway has rich neighbors who have forced the track to put in noise restrictions, and limit the schedule of major events every year. Most race tracks have to be located way out in the country to avoid noise complaints.
But let's get back to the noise from the machines. Isn't noise a byproduct of inefficiency? Heat is a byproduct of inefficiency, and I believe noise is as well.
Therefore - the petroleum-powered race machines are very inefficient because they're noisy as heck, and get extremely hot, right?
Therefore, by celebrating noisy race machines, aren't the fans celebrating inefficiency? Inefficiency means that more fuel is burned than is necessary, and when the fans turn around and buy their high speed whatever with loud pipes they're just continuing the trend of inefficiency. Right?
A byproduct of electrification in motorsports will be that they can locate their activities next to regular civilization, and there won't be noise pollution complaints. Maybe the tracks could be located inside city boundaries.
Formula E is an example. Their plan is to race on city streets in the center of major cities. Because they're using quieter race vehicles, they can do this without triggering noise complaints.
What I've seen having attended several handfuls of electric races is that the action is just as exciting without the noise. With quieter race vehicles we aren't annoyed by all the racket from the machines.
At all these races, I've met only a few people who truly demand that noise has to be part of racing. Most of those I've talked with mention the "eery" quietness of the race vehicles, but go on with appreciating the racing skill and the speed in front of them.
The only real "negative" I've seen is that electric race vehicles have a tendency to sneak up on you. You can be watching in one direction, and then get surprised when one of the vehicles suddenly pops into view because you didn't hear it coming. In my case that means I sometimes miss a picture.
It's not like the vehicles are 100% silent, however. They're still making some noise just nowhere near as much. The tires are still crunching the road, and the chains or belts or gears in the drive train still make some noise, as will the controller and as well the vehicle itself as it pushes itself through the air. Stand next to the pit wall when one of these machines whooshes by at 150-170+ miles/hr, and it feels like the elemental force of the wind.
For many, racing is not just the speed, it's the noise, the smell of burnt fuel, or burnt rubber, the unhealthy food, etc. To each their own really, but the noise is one of the obvious differences between gasoline-powered and electricity-powered racing. In some cases gasoline-powered racing really plays up the noise and other aspects of using flammable explosive liquids to power their machines. I recall seeing one video of a race car with banks of tailpipes along each side of the car, and those pipes were literally belching fire as the driver cranked the accelerator pedal.
We have decades now of cultural experience saying that race vehicles are loud, they belch fumes, and often belch fire. Oh, and if they crash, race vehicles often catch fire.
But does it have to be that way?
In some circles the noise is called noise pollution, and the fumes are called air pollution. Other people outside the racing community want both to be reduced. For example, the common complaint about off-road vehicle enthusiasts is the noise diminishing the feeling of tranquility many seek in the wilderness.
![]() |
| TTXGP 2010 @ Infineon Raceway |
I've been to enough electric racing events to see several sides of this. First, is the relative quietness of electric race vehicles lets you have normal conversation during the race, and to hear the announcers. The first time I experienced this was at the 24 Hours of Electricross race put on by Zero Motorcycles (a 24 hour Endurance race using electric dirt bikes with fast swappable batteries), and someone came up to me while I was filming and whispered "isn't it nice to be able to have a conversation next to a race track?" I believe that made it into the following video (see writeup of that event here and here and here):
In the video you can also hear sounds that would have been drowned out had these been gas bikes, such as noises from the paint-ball field next door.
How many race tracks have neighbors who complain about the noise, and have instituted noise restrictions on the track? Well, you might think someone who moves in next door to a race track might expect some noise, but this does happen. Laguna Seca Raceway has rich neighbors who have forced the track to put in noise restrictions, and limit the schedule of major events every year. Most race tracks have to be located way out in the country to avoid noise complaints.
But let's get back to the noise from the machines. Isn't noise a byproduct of inefficiency? Heat is a byproduct of inefficiency, and I believe noise is as well.
Therefore - the petroleum-powered race machines are very inefficient because they're noisy as heck, and get extremely hot, right?
Therefore, by celebrating noisy race machines, aren't the fans celebrating inefficiency? Inefficiency means that more fuel is burned than is necessary, and when the fans turn around and buy their high speed whatever with loud pipes they're just continuing the trend of inefficiency. Right?
A byproduct of electrification in motorsports will be that they can locate their activities next to regular civilization, and there won't be noise pollution complaints. Maybe the tracks could be located inside city boundaries.
![]() |
| Formula E race car in Downtown LA traffic |
Formula E is an example. Their plan is to race on city streets in the center of major cities. Because they're using quieter race vehicles, they can do this without triggering noise complaints.
What I've seen having attended several handfuls of electric races is that the action is just as exciting without the noise. With quieter race vehicles we aren't annoyed by all the racket from the machines.
At all these races, I've met only a few people who truly demand that noise has to be part of racing. Most of those I've talked with mention the "eery" quietness of the race vehicles, but go on with appreciating the racing skill and the speed in front of them.
The only real "negative" I've seen is that electric race vehicles have a tendency to sneak up on you. You can be watching in one direction, and then get surprised when one of the vehicles suddenly pops into view because you didn't hear it coming. In my case that means I sometimes miss a picture.
It's not like the vehicles are 100% silent, however. They're still making some noise just nowhere near as much. The tires are still crunching the road, and the chains or belts or gears in the drive train still make some noise, as will the controller and as well the vehicle itself as it pushes itself through the air. Stand next to the pit wall when one of these machines whooshes by at 150-170+ miles/hr, and it feels like the elemental force of the wind.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Lightning Motorcycles makes motorsports history at Pikes Peak with win
As we predicted, Lightning Motorcycles with Carlin Dunne did win outright in the motorcycle division. That news is being overshadowed by a shocker of a win by Sebastien Loeb with an 8:13.878 lap time that demolished the previous record of 9:46.164 held by Rhys Millen, but we're here to discuss electric racing not gas powered. The electric cars and motorcycles both made a great showing. The fastest electric car almost beat Millen's previous record, for example.
The biggest news for electric racing is the win by Lightning Motorcycles. Carlin Dunne finished with a 10:00.694 lap time, average speed of 71.917 miles/hr.
The next fastest motorcycle was ridden by Bruno Langlois, in the Pikes Peak 1205 class, for a 10:21.323 lap time and 69.529 miles/hr speed. The next fastest bike after him was in the Superbike 750 class, ridden by Michael Henao, with a 10:31.499 lap time and 68.409 miles/hr average speed.
While Dunne beat all the gas bikes by a 20 second margin, he didn't beat the overall motorcycle record of 09:52.819 set by Dunne himself in the Pikes Peak 1205 class in 2012. Dunne's 2013 result was #9 in the overall standings, #1 in the motorcycle standings.
Basically .. this puts the motorsports world on notice. Electric racing is catching up. Electric bikes just won in a major international event against the gas bikes.
It's not too dissimilar in the electric cars at Pikes Peak either. Monster Tajima nearly beat the previous lap record held by Rhys Millen, with a lap time of 9:46.530, average speed of 73.654 miles/hr. This should catch some attention as well. However, Tajima earned fifth place overall and the top four finishers all beat Millen's previous record.
Both Mitsubishi and Toyota in their post-race press releases expressed disappointment, and blamed the rain for their showing. The electric (car) division went out after a heavy rain-storm.
Mitsubishi switched to grooved tires, and even with those the cars were sliding quite a bit. Greg Tracy said he was aiming for the win and was disappointed. He wants to come back in dry conditions and try this again.
Toyota went with an "intermediate" tire but it didn't have enough "grip" for Millen to get a good result. They're additionally pointing to having brought a two-wheeled race car when other "class competitors" were running four-wheel drive vehicles.
Amarok Racing entered a custom built electric motorcycle featuring twin Agni motors and going by the results I believe it would have finished with a time competitive with the Zero Motorcycles bikes. They posted on Facebook saying their rider ran into a wreck about 2 miles uphill, and had to start over. With a diminished battery pack he ended up running the pack flat five turns from the top.
The bulk of the electric motorcycles were made by Zero Motorcycles, in a conglomerate organized by Zero and Hollywood Electrics. Those bikes are roughly equivalent to 250cc gas bikes, and indeed there were 250cc bike results scattered among the results for Zero riders.
Perhaps the most interesting thing is that the top three Zero results beat Chip Yates' record for electric motorcycles at Pikes Peak in 2011. His laptime in 2011, 12:50.094, gave him some bragging rights at the time. He was originally planning to enter in 2013 with Lightning Motorcycles to defend that time, but backed out apparently after learning that Carlin Dunne had joined the team. That aside, his time was beaten by nearly a minute by three riders, with the top rider (Jeff Clark) riding not a Zero S but a Zero FX.
To put this in perspective - during 2010 and 2011, Chip Yates made a lot of noise claiming he'd built the first legitimate electric superbike. His bike was big and heavy, and relied on a UQM drive train that would normally be used for electric trucks. With it he entered and won a gas bike race, in a club race series in Southern California, entered the 2011 Pikes Peak, and went to the Bonneville Salt Flats for land speed racing hitting speeds close to 200 miles/hr.
That was with a custom built heavy electric motorcycle. These riders in the Zero Motorcycles group (the Exhibition Powersports-Z class) were all riding factory built bikes that were largely stock. That's how fast the electric motorcycle industry is advancing.
In short, electric racing is catching up quick with gas powered. We had one outright win this weekend, and there will be more to come.
The full results for electrics were:
Image sources:
Lightning Motorcycles: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151670622597210&set=a.389507682209.167316.336377937209&type=1&theater
Monster Tajima - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=549218995135101&set=o.336377937209&type=1&theater
Toyota: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=605511069482180&set=a.604652496234704.1073741876.330359950330628&type=1&theater
Mitsubishi: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=613281942030015&set=a.613281815363361.1073741836.178795422145338&type=1&theater
Zero Motorcycles: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151671551137210&set=a.389507682209.167316.336377937209&type=1&theater
The biggest news for electric racing is the win by Lightning Motorcycles. Carlin Dunne finished with a 10:00.694 lap time, average speed of 71.917 miles/hr.
The next fastest motorcycle was ridden by Bruno Langlois, in the Pikes Peak 1205 class, for a 10:21.323 lap time and 69.529 miles/hr speed. The next fastest bike after him was in the Superbike 750 class, ridden by Michael Henao, with a 10:31.499 lap time and 68.409 miles/hr average speed.
While Dunne beat all the gas bikes by a 20 second margin, he didn't beat the overall motorcycle record of 09:52.819 set by Dunne himself in the Pikes Peak 1205 class in 2012. Dunne's 2013 result was #9 in the overall standings, #1 in the motorcycle standings.
Basically .. this puts the motorsports world on notice. Electric racing is catching up. Electric bikes just won in a major international event against the gas bikes.
![]() |
Both Mitsubishi and Toyota in their post-race press releases expressed disappointment, and blamed the rain for their showing. The electric (car) division went out after a heavy rain-storm.
Mitsubishi switched to grooved tires, and even with those the cars were sliding quite a bit. Greg Tracy said he was aiming for the win and was disappointed. He wants to come back in dry conditions and try this again.
Toyota went with an "intermediate" tire but it didn't have enough "grip" for Millen to get a good result. They're additionally pointing to having brought a two-wheeled race car when other "class competitors" were running four-wheel drive vehicles.
Amarok Racing entered a custom built electric motorcycle featuring twin Agni motors and going by the results I believe it would have finished with a time competitive with the Zero Motorcycles bikes. They posted on Facebook saying their rider ran into a wreck about 2 miles uphill, and had to start over. With a diminished battery pack he ended up running the pack flat five turns from the top.
The bulk of the electric motorcycles were made by Zero Motorcycles, in a conglomerate organized by Zero and Hollywood Electrics. Those bikes are roughly equivalent to 250cc gas bikes, and indeed there were 250cc bike results scattered among the results for Zero riders.
Perhaps the most interesting thing is that the top three Zero results beat Chip Yates' record for electric motorcycles at Pikes Peak in 2011. His laptime in 2011, 12:50.094, gave him some bragging rights at the time. He was originally planning to enter in 2013 with Lightning Motorcycles to defend that time, but backed out apparently after learning that Carlin Dunne had joined the team. That aside, his time was beaten by nearly a minute by three riders, with the top rider (Jeff Clark) riding not a Zero S but a Zero FX.
To put this in perspective - during 2010 and 2011, Chip Yates made a lot of noise claiming he'd built the first legitimate electric superbike. His bike was big and heavy, and relied on a UQM drive train that would normally be used for electric trucks. With it he entered and won a gas bike race, in a club race series in Southern California, entered the 2011 Pikes Peak, and went to the Bonneville Salt Flats for land speed racing hitting speeds close to 200 miles/hr.
That was with a custom built heavy electric motorcycle. These riders in the Zero Motorcycles group (the Exhibition Powersports-Z class) were all riding factory built bikes that were largely stock. That's how fast the electric motorcycle industry is advancing.
In short, electric racing is catching up quick with gas powered. We had one outright win this weekend, and there will be more to come.
The full results for electrics were:
- #5: Nobuhiro Tajima, 9:46.530 lap time, 73.654 miles/hr average speed (Monster Tajima)
- #9: Carlin Dunne, 10:00.694 lap time, 71.917 miles/hr average speed (Lightning Motorcycles)
- #13: Hiroshi Masuoka, 10:21.866 lap time, 69.468 miles/hr average speed (Mitsubishi)
- #14: Greg Tracy, 10:23.649 lap time, 69.270 miles/hr average speed (Mitsubishi)
- #16: Rod Millen, 10:24.301 lap time, 69.197 miles/hr average speed (Toyota EV P002)
- #63: Jeff Clark, 12:00.978 lap time, 59.919 miles/hr average speed (Zero)
- #67: Jeremiah Johnson, 12:05.612 lap time, 59.536 miles/hr average speed (Zero)
- #79: Troy Siahaan, 12:24.083 lap time, 58.058 miles/hr average speed (Zero)
- #95: Ted Rich, 12:53.612 lap time, 55.842 miles/hr average speed (Zero)
- #105: Nathan Barker, 13:14.262 lap time, 54.390 miles/hr average speed (Zero)
- #106: Brandon Nozaki-Miller, 13:16.476 lap time, 54.239 miles/hr average speed (Zero)
- #130: Roy Richards, 17:30.614 lap time, 41.119 miles/hr average speed (Honda Fit EV)
- #133: Ikuo Hanawa, DNF (Yokohama Tires, Summit Racing)
- #134: Janis Horeliks, DNF (Drive EO)
- #137: Michael Leon, DNF (Amarok)
Image sources:
Lightning Motorcycles: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151670622597210&set=a.389507682209.167316.336377937209&type=1&theater
Monster Tajima - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=549218995135101&set=o.336377937209&type=1&theater
Toyota: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=605511069482180&set=a.604652496234704.1073741876.330359950330628&type=1&theater
Mitsubishi: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=613281942030015&set=a.613281815363361.1073741836.178795422145338&type=1&theater
Zero Motorcycles: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151671551137210&set=a.389507682209.167316.336377937209&type=1&theater
Monday, July 1, 2013
Kleenspeed being aquired by Flux Power - missed REFUEL 2013
At yesterday's REFUEL race there was a conspicuous missing participant who had shown up to the previous four REFUEL's, and holds the track record for electric race cars. Namely, Kleenspeed. It was largely because Kleenspeed was absent that Brammo's Eric Bostrom was able to win the event outright with a 1:38 lap time. Kleenspeed is a start-up company based at Moffett Field in Mountain View CA (a stones throw from where I live) who is developing electric vehicle drive train technology. One of their development vehicles is an electric race car which they've brought to several race tracks in the SF Bay Area to set lap speed records.
The Kleenspeed record lap time at Laguna Seca was set by KEVIN MITZ, driving the Kleenspeed EV-X11, for a 1:32.046 lap time, and 87.5 miles/hr average speed. That's a very respectable speed, which puts it in the realm of the electric and gas superbikes on that track. For comparison at the 2013 REFUEL, the top Tesla's hit 1:48 lap times, and the overall winner was Eric Bostrom, riding Brammo's Empulse RR electric motorcycle, with a 1:38.502 lap time.
Where was Kleenspeed, a company that had been a fixture of the REFUEL races for so long?
On Thursday, last week, Kleenspeed and Flux Power Holdings announced that Flux had signed a letter of intent to acquire Kleenspeed. The LOI proposes that upon the successful closing of the acquisition, KleenSpeed will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flux Power and Flux Power's Board of Directors will be expanded from three members to five members with KleenSpeed's current CEO, Timothy Collins, joining the Board of Flux Power and assuming the role of Executive Chairman of Flux Power.
The press release describes Kleenspeed as having developed products for "distributed energy markets, including grid storage." In other words, they're seen by Flux Power as a battery pack maker, when the company's product line includes electric vehicle drive trains as well.
Of course, the Kleenspeed management would have been tied up with those negotiations, and unable to organize attending REFUEL.
The exact terms of the acquisition haven't been decided, however Flux Power intends to issue a bunch of shares to raise some capital, offer 11 million shares of Flux Power to Kleenspeed shareholders, and whatnot.
Flux Power is a developer of battery pack systems and was founded by Chris Anthony who had been a founder of Aptera. Kleenspeed is developing both battery pack systems, and drive train components for electric vehicles.
One of Kleenspeed's designs is the KAR, an electric micro-car that they're looking for manufacturing partners to build. Chris Anthony happens to also own an electric vehicle manufacturing company, Epic Electric Vehicles, that focuses on using composites in vehicle design. Perhaps Epic will work with Kleenspeed engineers on furthering the KAR design?
"We are looking forward to becoming part of the Flux team. There is a tremendous synergy between our technologies, products, and vision for the alternative energy storage market. The proposed acquisition will enable both of our organizations to leverage the strength of our financial resources, broaden our product development and sales reach globally, and significantly increase our opportunity to grow revenue and returns to our shareholders," said Timothy Collins, CEO of KleenSpeed.
The Kleenspeed record lap time at Laguna Seca was set by KEVIN MITZ, driving the Kleenspeed EV-X11, for a 1:32.046 lap time, and 87.5 miles/hr average speed. That's a very respectable speed, which puts it in the realm of the electric and gas superbikes on that track. For comparison at the 2013 REFUEL, the top Tesla's hit 1:48 lap times, and the overall winner was Eric Bostrom, riding Brammo's Empulse RR electric motorcycle, with a 1:38.502 lap time.
Where was Kleenspeed, a company that had been a fixture of the REFUEL races for so long?
On Thursday, last week, Kleenspeed and Flux Power Holdings announced that Flux had signed a letter of intent to acquire Kleenspeed. The LOI proposes that upon the successful closing of the acquisition, KleenSpeed will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flux Power and Flux Power's Board of Directors will be expanded from three members to five members with KleenSpeed's current CEO, Timothy Collins, joining the Board of Flux Power and assuming the role of Executive Chairman of Flux Power.
The press release describes Kleenspeed as having developed products for "distributed energy markets, including grid storage." In other words, they're seen by Flux Power as a battery pack maker, when the company's product line includes electric vehicle drive trains as well.
Of course, the Kleenspeed management would have been tied up with those negotiations, and unable to organize attending REFUEL.
The exact terms of the acquisition haven't been decided, however Flux Power intends to issue a bunch of shares to raise some capital, offer 11 million shares of Flux Power to Kleenspeed shareholders, and whatnot.
Flux Power is a developer of battery pack systems and was founded by Chris Anthony who had been a founder of Aptera. Kleenspeed is developing both battery pack systems, and drive train components for electric vehicles.
One of Kleenspeed's designs is the KAR, an electric micro-car that they're looking for manufacturing partners to build. Chris Anthony happens to also own an electric vehicle manufacturing company, Epic Electric Vehicles, that focuses on using composites in vehicle design. Perhaps Epic will work with Kleenspeed engineers on furthering the KAR design?
"We are looking forward to becoming part of the Flux team. There is a tremendous synergy between our technologies, products, and vision for the alternative energy storage market. The proposed acquisition will enable both of our organizations to leverage the strength of our financial resources, broaden our product development and sales reach globally, and significantly increase our opportunity to grow revenue and returns to our shareholders," said Timothy Collins, CEO of KleenSpeed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















